Chief Amateur Scout Jeff Kealty Reflects on the 2013 NHL Scouting Combine

Monday, 06.03.2013 / 2:53 PM / Features
By Jimi Russell  - Nashville Predators

Following last week’s NHL Scouting Combine in Toronto, nashvillepredators.com caught up with Chief Amateur Scout Jeff Kealty to discuss the combine process and how the Predators’ scouting staff goes about evaluating prospects at the combine and beyond.

NashvillePredators.com: Describe the scouting combine process this year compared to the past few years when the Preds didn’t have a first-round pick or even a high first-round pick.

Kealty: The format has stayed pretty much the same as it has been in past years. Like you said, we haven’t had a first-round pick in a couple of years, so it is a little bit different this year. We’ve always been prepared because you never know what can come about. This year, we were much more focused on the top guys because we are picking fourth and we know how important that pick is. All in all, it was a very good week and we met with a lot of good kids – not just at the top of the draft but all the way through. We are very happy with the way it went.

NP.com: Do you treat the combine as more of a job interview or are you using that time to get to know the players on a personal level?

Kealty: It’s a little bit of both – It’s a job interview in the sense that this is a business and you have to find out about these kids if there are questions that need to be asked. At the same time, they are 17- and 18-year-old kids that you have to try to make comfortable enough to answer the tough questions and get real answers out of them. A lot of them come in and they’ve been schooled by their program or agent to answer questions a certain way. So we try to put the kid in a comfortable situation so he really answers the questions that we ask and we get the information we want.

NP.com: How much weight do the interviews and physical fitness tests hold when making decisions on prospects?

Kealty: It really depends on the kid. For the most part, I would say the interviews hold more weight, but it really depends on the kid. Every player is different – there may be one player who had some character or personality questions that you need to check on, while another kid had questions about his physical strength and how much stronger he can get over the course of his development. There isn’t an exact science to the process. So we look at it from an individual basis based on the kid’s strengths and weaknesses.

NP.com: Seth Jones, Nathan MacKinnon, Jonathan Drouin and Aleksander Barkov all skipped the physical fitness tests for various reasons. Does it make the process harder when you don’t have the physical element to look at when analyzing a player?

Kealty: Those guys are such top-end players and in their case there haven’t been any huge questions about their physical abilities. So it wasn’t a huge draw back that we couldn’t see them participate in the fitness portion. As far as the three that participated in the Memorial Cup, they all had very long seasons, played a lot of games and proved a lot over the course of the year. When you just finished playing 90-plus games or whatever it was a few days earlier, it’s not that big of a deal because they didn’t have enough training to put into it. In Barkov’s case, he was injured. Again, there weren’t questions physically with any of these guys, so it’s not a huge issue going forward.

NP.com: Did the performances of the top three at the Memorial Cup have any bearing on your opinion of those players?

Kealty: I think every scout is different when it comes to games like that. In our case, we certainly weigh it because it’s a big game on a big stage. Those three guys were outstanding in the Memorial Cup, but we do look at other events throughout the year. Looking back, Jones was probably everyone’s top guy going back to the World Juniors and that may or may not have changed after the Cup. All these big games are certainly pieces of the puzzle, but overall, we look at the body of work when it comes to deciding who will be the best player in the end.

NP.com: Were there any surprises – either positive or negative – among the top six or seven players?

Kealty: There weren’t any big surprises from any of those guys. If anything, it reaffirmed just how high-end these players are. We all know what they can do on the ice, but when you get them in the room and ask them questions – that’s when you see how focused they are, how driven they are, and how well they know the game and where they are going. That fact really adds to why they are as elite as they are.

NP.com: What factor does the recent Valeri Nichushkin news play going forward?

Kealty: All along we knew that he ultimately wanted to play in the NHL. I think all of the top players in the world want to play in the NHL because it’s the best league in the world. What Nichushkin’s course is to get there may be a little different. If he doesn’t make a team next year and ends up back in the KHL, I think ultimately, he wants to be here and he will be here. We’ve been looking at it like that all along.

NP.com: What the process between now and the draft?

Kealty: I will stay in contact with David Poile and Paul Fenton on a regular basis. The staff, as a whole, will continue to talk and have several conference calls over the next three weeks or so. We focus on our lists, but we also begin to get a game plan together for how we will react to certain situations on draft day. As you know, we work the entire year for one day, so the more prepared we are, the better we will be able to react on the floor.

In order to view this page you need JavaScript and Flash Player 9+ support!

SCHEDULE

HOME
AWAY
PROMOTIONAL

STANDINGS

WESTERN CONFERENCE
  TEAM GP W L OT GF GA PTS
1 z - ANA 82 54 20 8 266 209 116
2 y - COL 82 52 22 8 250 220 112
3 x - STL 82 52 23 7 248 191 111
4 x - SJS 82 51 22 9 249 200 111
5 x - CHI 82 46 21 15 267 220 107
6 x - LAK 82 46 28 8 206 174 100
7 x - MIN 82 43 27 12 207 206 98
8 x - DAL 82 40 31 11 235 228 91
9 PHX 82 37 30 15 216 231 89
10 NSH 82 38 32 12 216 242 88
11 WPG 82 37 35 10 227 237 84
12 VAN 82 36 35 11 196 223 83
13 CGY 82 35 40 7 209 241 77
14 EDM 82 29 44 9 203 270 67

STATS

2013-2014 REGULAR SEASON
SKATERS: GP G A +/- Pts
S. Weber 79 23 33 -2 56
P. Hornqvist 76 22 31 1 53
C. Smith 79 24 28 16 52
M. Fisher 75 20 29 -4 49
R. Josi 72 13 27 -2 40
M. Cullen 77 10 29 4 39
C. Wilson 81 11 22 -1 33
N. Spaling 71 13 19 2 32
R. Ellis 80 6 21 9 27
G. Bourque 74 9 17 -5 26
 
GOALIES: W L OT Sv% GAA
C. Hutton 20 11 4 .910 2.62
D. Dubnyk 11 18 3 .891 3.43

 
 

nashvillepredators.com is the official Web site of the Nashville Predators and nashvillepredators.com are trademarks of the Nashville Predators.  NHL, the NHL Shield, the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup and NHL Conference logos are registered trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P. Copyright © 1999-2013 Nashville Predators and the National Hockey League. All Rights Reserved.

NHL Ticket Exchange | Bridgestone Arena | Contact Us | Employment | NHL.com Terms of Use | Site Map | AdChoices