• PRINT
  • RSS

Face-off Struggles Plague Preds in Game 1

Saturday, 04.28.2012 / 12:01 PM CT / Features
By Doug Brumley  - Nashville Predators
X
Share with your Friends


Face-off Struggles Plague Preds in Game 1

Often overlooked as trivial or a game of chance by the casual fan, face-offs can play a huge role in a hockey game. Just look at Friday’s Game 1 of the Round 2 playoff match-up between the Nashville Predators and the Phoenix Coyotes, where a face-off win by Martin Hanzal led directly to Ray Whitney’s game-winning goal in overtime.

Winning these set scrums for the puck gives your team possession and the ability to manage the game for a brief period of time. String a lot of these wins together and you can manage your risk to some degree by keeping the puck off your opponent’s sticks.

Entering Round 2 of the playoffs, the Predators and Coyotes were neck-and-neck in face-off performance: Phoenix ranked seventh in the playoffs (winning 50.6 percent of their draws), Nashville ranked eighth (50.1 percent). But the results weren’t nearly that even in Game 1, with the Predators winning just 32 of 78 face-offs (41 percent). It was Nashville’s worst performance in the face-off circle in six playoff games this April.

“To me the area that we have to be a lot better is face-offs,” Predators head coach Barry Trotz said after the game. “We ended up losing the game on a face-off. That first period it was 21 percent. That's not good enough for playoff hockey.”

Given the significance of the face-off, each team has its own specialist at the art/skill. Over the course of the regular season, Nashville’s Paul Gaustad and Phoenix’s Boyd Gordon ranked seventh (57.3 percent) and eighth (56.8) in the league, respectively. The two lived up to their advance billing in Game 1. Gaustad was dominant, winning nine of 13 draws (69 percent), and Gordon went 13 of 22 (59 percent).

But those two weren’t the difference in the series opener. Removing Gaustad’s impressive numbers, the Predators won just 23 of 65 face-offs taken—a success rate of 35 percent. Given the fact that coaches typically save face-off rock stars like Gaustad for the defensive zone draws—the ones closest to their net and therefore the most threatening—one can begin to see the circumstances that limited defenseman Shea Weber to just two shots on goal Friday. Weber, who led Nashville in shots through the first round, often gets to tee up his wicked slapshot from offensive-zone face-off wins. (See the clip below for an example from Game 1.)

“Winning a draw is not purely the centerman—it's the wingers helping out too,” Trotz said. “But the centermen have to be, I'll say, a lot more effective in the circle. If you're not winning the draws, at least go for the tie and tie 'em up and then get some help from your wingers.”

SMASHVILLE CENTRAL

SCHEDULE
 

HOME
AWAY
PROMOTIONAL

STANDINGS
 

WESTERN CONFERENCE
  TEAM GP W L OT GF GA PTS
1 CHI 56 36 16 4 158 128 76
2 DAL 53 33 15 5 170 142 71
3 STL 55 30 17 8 132 129 68
4 LAK 51 31 17 3 135 117 65
5 SJS 51 27 20 4 147 138 58
6 NSH 53 25 20 8 136 139 58
7 COL 55 27 24 4 148 152 58
8 ANA 51 25 19 7 113 121 57
9 MIN 52 23 20 9 127 126 55
10 ARI 52 24 22 6 138 161 54
11 VAN 52 20 20 12 120 142 52
12 CGY 51 23 25 3 134 148 49
13 WPG 52 23 26 3 136 150 49
14 EDM 54 21 28 5 132 164 47

STATS

2015-2016 REGULAR SEASON
SKATERS: GP G A +/- Pts
R. Josi 53 10 27 -2 37
S. Weber 53 14 21 -4 35
F. Forsberg 53 15 18 -6 33
M. Ribeiro 53 6 27 3 33
J. Neal 53 19 13 18 32
M. Ekholm 53 6 16 3 22
R. Ellis 52 6 15 2 21
C. Smith 53 11 6 -1 17
C. Jarnkrok 52 9 7 0 16
C. Wilson 36 4 12 0 16
 
GOALIES: W L OT Sv% GAA
P. Rinne 20 17 7 .904 2.50
C. Hutton 5 2 1 .916 2.36