Fighting's Future

Tuesday, 09.25.2012 / 2:00 PM

The debate over fighting in hockey takes on a new wrinkle with the advent of a recent rule change in the Ontario Hockey League (“OHL”). The OHL, starting this season, will assess a two game suspension for any player that receives a fighting major over and above his 10th. By implementing this rule, the OHL is taking deliberate steps to curb fighting and perhaps, to phase out the role of enforcer altogether. I thought it would be worthwhile discussing some of the competing arguments in this area for the following reason. NHL officials are on record saying that they will be closely monitoring the impact this rule has on the game at the junior level. Translation: “the NHL will consider implementing such a rule if we like what we see.”

As most of you know, fighting was a prominent part of my game throughout my junior, minor pro and NHL career – a period of time that spanned three decades. It’s also worth repeating that I left the game due to a concussion sustained in a fight. So below is one view, it is my view and I offer it in so far as it might inform the discussion on this issue. At the end of the day, I favor leaving fighting in the game. Let me explain why.

It should be noted on the front end that there are reasonable arguments on both sides of this issue. First, those that favor eliminating fighting from the game would cite player safety as the reason. No argument here. Ban fighting and you abolish one area where concussions occur on a fairly frequent basis. After all, reducing blows to the head is the primary justification for implementing a rule change in this area. The studies show, however, that concussions occur more frequently during the normal course of play rather than during a fight.

Second, there are those who would say that by allowing fighting in hockey you actually drive away interest in the game. It’s a fair point that fighting in the hockey context is fairly brutal. Remember, these are big men who go at it bare knuckles – and often times without helmets. By contrast, boxers and the mixed martial arts crowd wear gloves that provide some protection for the athlete.

Even so, I am not so sure this argument stands up. For one, it’s not a position I have ever seen supported with real data. And anecdotally, I don’t come across a lot of folks that avoid the sport for this reason. I suggest that anybody who’s philosophically opposed to hockey because it allows fighting may not be much of a sports fan to begin with. The point being; hockey isn’t going to draw that person into the arena anyways.

On the other hand, there are valid reasons to leave this aspect of the game as is. First, the presence of an enforcer keeps the other team honest. The opposition doesn’t take liberties with your team when you have an enforcer in the lineup. And if the ultimate goal is to reduce trauma to the head, this is one tool in a basket of tools that the NHL has at its disposal. The enforcer acts as a deterrent.

My experience has taught me that if you don’t have an enforcer in your lineup the other team will play you differently. And by “differently” I mean they may try to run you out of the building.

Second, the fighter drops his gloves with his eyes wide open. Today, more than ever, players understand the risks involved when they engage another player in a fight. In the law, players are said to have assumed the risk. And let’s face it; we live in a society where we are free to make our own choices – even when those choices pose a risk to our health. If we eliminate fighting for that reason, we are starting down a path to abolish any sport/activity where a risk of injury exists. Think about it. If we take fighting out of hockey because we’re concerned for the athlete involved; what prevents us from eliminating other similar sports/activities? Not far down the slippery slope sits boxing and mixed martial arts and other sports we love to follow.

Again, I am for leaving fighting in the game. I believe it deters other acts that cause injury and the enforcer/fighter appreciates the risks involved. Furthermore, there was a day in this game when fighting was far more widespread and completely random. Today, fighting is very much a tactical part of the game. When two players engage, there is usually a strategic purpose behind the altercation.

Having said all that, I also believe in keeping an open mind to proposed changes. Let’s watch to see what impact the OHL rule change has on the game at that level, if any. Who’s to say it won’t be for the better?

See you around the rink.




1 z - ANA 82 54 20 8 266 209 116
2 y - COL 82 52 22 8 250 220 112
3 x - STL 82 52 23 7 248 191 111
4 x - SJS 82 51 22 9 249 200 111
5 x - CHI 82 46 21 15 267 220 107
6 x - LAK 82 46 28 8 206 174 100
7 x - MIN 82 43 27 12 207 206 98
8 x - DAL 82 40 31 11 235 228 91
9 PHX 82 37 30 15 216 231 89
10 NSH 82 38 32 12 216 242 88
11 WPG 82 37 35 10 227 237 84
12 VAN 82 36 35 11 196 223 83
13 CGY 82 35 40 7 209 241 77
14 EDM 82 29 44 9 203 270 67


S. Weber 79 23 33 -2 56
P. Hornqvist 76 22 31 1 53
C. Smith 79 24 28 16 52
M. Fisher 75 20 29 -4 49
R. Josi 72 13 27 -2 40
M. Cullen 77 10 29 4 39
C. Wilson 81 11 22 -1 33
N. Spaling 71 13 19 2 32
R. Ellis 80 6 21 9 27
G. Bourque 74 9 17 -5 26
C. Hutton 20 11 4 .910 2.62
D. Dubnyk 11 18 3 .891 3.43 is the official Web site of the Nashville Predators and are trademarks of the Nashville Predators.  NHL, the NHL Shield, the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup and NHL Conference logos are registered trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P. Copyright © 1999-2013 Nashville Predators and the National Hockey League. All Rights Reserved.

NHL Ticket Exchange | Bridgestone Arena | Contact Us | Employment | Terms of Use | Site Map | AdChoices